- #MACBOOK PRO EARLY 2013 VS HOW TO#
- #MACBOOK PRO EARLY 2013 VS UPDATE#
- #MACBOOK PRO EARLY 2013 VS UPGRADE#
4 USB-C / Thunderbolt 3 ports for single-cable docking and charging.Roughly an hour of extra battery life (15-inch vs.More accurate butterfly keyboard switches.Much faster graphics (roughly 2x faster).įrom MacBook Pro with Retina Display (Late 2013-2015)Įven if you just bought a MacBook Pro last year, the new versions are a pretty big bump - because Apple hadn't meaningfully refreshed the lineup in quite some time.
#MACBOOK PRO EARLY 2013 VS HOW TO#
Here's how to find out which Mac you own. Just scroll down until you see your current Mac. ( Click here if you'd prefer a giant spec sheet.) Heck, the 13-inch MacBook Pro is smaller than a 13-inch MacBook Air now.īut what do you truly get if you upgrade, and what do you give up? Here's a handy guide to everything that changes if you trade in your old Mac for a shiny new Pro. It might look similar, but it's thinner and lighter, with far more power under the hood, a radically redesigned keyboard and a tiny, potentially amazing touchscreen. So I myself am also interested to see what Apple plans to release this new product cycle.The new MacBook Pro is here, available for preorder today, and in many ways it's a very different machine. Given the fact they keep the "legacy" MBP on the shelf, it tells me I can't be the only Apple customer that wants to perform their own upgrades.
#MACBOOK PRO EARLY 2013 VS UPDATE#
In fact, both models are past their average update cycle and is currently in a "do not buy" recommendation as both should be updated soon.Īs I noted before, for me the frustrating part is the Air and Retina MBP's is the USER cannot update RAM, hard drive, etc. The retina MBP and MBP Air are both due for updates soon based on previous life cycles as reported by Macrumors. Pretty sure the next "update" will be Apple pulling the plug on this particular model. Prior to this they were updating every 230-300 days. According to Macrumors, it's about 1521 days into the 2012 life cycle. If you are considering the "legacy" MBP, I wouldn't hold your breath for any updates. Yea, I actually decided to just wait to see if Apple actually releases new ones this year.
#MACBOOK PRO EARLY 2013 VS UPGRADE#
I am interested to see if this changes before my MBP dies as right now I don't want to spend money on a computer I can't upgrade small stuff myself. Good model for Apple, but not for the end user as it forces them to upgrade & spend more upfront or replace their computer later on. What I don't like about the newer retina models is they are "one & done" computers. Overall, we are very happy with these MBP's. I am considering the SSD swap on my own machine (uncertain if I will add a second drive using the optical drive upgrade or just truly do a HDD/SSD replacement). My 2011 is pushing a little over 5 years and going strong.
I fully intend to upgrade the RAM and HDD as her needs demand it. We went with a base model and student discount for less than $1,000 for a BRAND NEW unit. OWC offers a solution that allows the USER to remove the optical drive & swap-in a secondary SSD drive USER can upgrade HDD (or change to SSD) as needs/desires changeĤ. USER can upgrade RAM as needs/desires changeģ. Reasons I opted to purchase this for her:Ģ. It's more than sufficient for typical needs (we aren't computer gamers), and hers is a little faster than mine (late 2011). I bought one of these NEW for my wife a little over a year ago. If you buy one of these legacy MBP's today, brand new in the box, it was still last updated in 2012. So even though it may be a "2013 MBP" if it is this model, it was last updated 2012. Just to clarify, the 2013 MBP is a non-retina display? If so, this is what I refer to as their "legacy" MBP and it has not been updated since 2012 by Apple. Thanks for the help, I'll contact the seller for the MBP. As for used, you're going to have to look it over, kick the tires, and decide for yourself if the wear and tear is acceptable. But for a Haswell MBP vs a Broadwell Macbook, get the MBP. If this were a 2013 MBP vs a 2016 Macbook with Skylake, it'd be a tougher decision. I think we've gotten to the point where the vast majority of the power draw over the 6-8 hours you use a laptop is now from components other than the CPU, so reducing the CPU's power consumption doesn't help as much as it used to. There's supposed to be a power savings due to the smaller transistor size in Broadwell, but I haven't seen much from the Broadwell and even Skylake laptop benchmarks I've seen. Broadwell does have a better integrated GPU, but Apple uses Intel Iris or Iris Pro in their MBPs, so the MBP should still be better for gaming.
Broadwell is just Haswell shrunk down to 14nm, while Haswell is still 22nm. The speed difference between Haswell (used in the 2013 MBP) and Broadwell is nil.
0 kommentar(er)
